Reputation
Top tag
Next privilege 100 Rep.
Edit community wikis
Badges
7
Impact
~1k people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 0 helpful flags
  • 12 votes cast
Dec
15
comment Graphics3D/Plot3D rendering issue
I also have Eclipse and Android Studio installed on this laptop. Could I have enabled some setting (particularly with Android Studio) that might be causing this rendering issue?
Dec
15
comment Graphics3D/Plot3D rendering issue
@thedude turning off antialiasing seems to improve the rendering of the numbers on the axes of Plot3D a bit. The two sides of the "bounding box" remain, however, and diagonal lines look a bit more choppy in general due to the lack of antialiasing.
Dec
11
revised Graphics3D/Plot3D rendering issue
edited title
Dec
11
comment Graphics3D/Plot3D rendering issue
Also, I should say that it's more than just the font rendering issue. There is also the issue of the unpleasant two-sided "bounding box".
Dec
11
comment Graphics3D/Plot3D rendering issue
Unfortunately, that also doesn't fix the issues. I appreciate your trying, though!
Dec
11
comment Graphics3D/Plot3D rendering issue
Thanks for the suggestion, David! Unfortunately, that does not help with the rendering issues. Though larger, the labels are still low resolution, and the two-sided "bounding box" is still there. Do you think it's something beyond Mathematica that is causing the issue?
Dec
11
comment Graphics3D/Plot3D rendering issue
Windows. I've tried this on another identical-model laptop as well as other computers without this issue, so there's something seemingly specific to my configuration that is causing the problem.
Dec
10
asked Graphics3D/Plot3D rendering issue
Jul
8
awarded  Nice Question
Jun
27
awarded  Commentator
Jun
27
comment How can I return private members of a Mathematica package as the output of package functions without the “PackageName`Private`” prefix?
@Mr.Wizard -- The first link that you provided above is indeed an answer to my second question about obtaining context-free information/definitions of functions in my package. I believe that the main question I had, however, is not addressed by either of the above links, but is instead beautifully answered by Oleksandr below. Would you agree?
Jun
27
comment How can I return private members of a Mathematica package as the output of package functions without the “PackageName`Private`” prefix?
Thanks R.M; this was a great answer to my second question -- I will definitely be using this! I wish there were a way to accept more than one answer for this question, since it had two (related) parts to it. Out of curiosity, is it commonplace to modify default Mathematica functions/behaviors like you have done with Definition above?
Jun
27
awarded  Scholar
Jun
27
accepted How can I return private members of a Mathematica package as the output of package functions without the “PackageName`Private`” prefix?
Jun
27
comment How can I return private members of a Mathematica package as the output of package functions without the “PackageName`Private`” prefix?
Hi Oleksandr! MakeBoxes and InterpretationBox were exactly what I was looking for; the additional information about making Mathematica function more like an object-oriented language was the cherry on top! Thank you very much!
Jun
27
awarded  Supporter
Jun
27
awarded  Analytical
Jun
27
revised How can I return private members of a Mathematica package as the output of package functions without the “PackageName`Private`” prefix?
added 604 characters in body
Jun
27
awarded  Editor
Jun
27
revised How can I return private members of a Mathematica package as the output of package functions without the “PackageName`Private`” prefix?
deleted 29 characters in body