171 reputation
6
bio website
location
age
visits member for 11 months
seen Mar 19 at 22:58
stats profile views 23

Dec
4
comment Reading in Huge Text Files
@LeonidShifrin if you can make your comment an answer, I can see if it works and if it did, I can choose it as the best answer.Thanks.
Dec
4
comment Reading in Huge Text Files
your comment (that's what I meant,especially using BinaryReadList[] ) and also for the answer, how to do it when I call mathematica using -noprompt -script "test.m"? Thanks
Dec
4
comment Reading in Huge Text Files
The three links above especially the third one are related but not exactly what I need. I don't have a problem with memory. It is only the speed that I am concerned. Also, I was looking for something like if I could tell mathematica that those are going to be numbers, is it possible that it will save time? For eg: in R, it does help a lot.@LeonidShifrin can you please explain your answer? Sorry, I am not able to understand.
Dec
4
asked Reading in Huge Text Files
Dec
3
accepted MathKernel and MathLM interaction
Dec
3
revised MathKernel and MathLM interaction
added 307 characters in body
Nov
29
comment Mathematica 9 Linking with R
@LeonidShifrin - ReadList[] seems to do that. It will wait until the job is done despite the '&' but Run seems to work fine (on mac)
Nov
29
comment Mathematica 9 Linking with R
@Leonid - I am not an expert in mathematica. So, I don't know what you mean, but I tried the above one and it works for me. Mine was a mac machine. I am going to try on the Linux machine and if it does work there too, I'll make this as an answer. You are the one who developed the RLink thing right? Can you please tell me if there are any other ways to do this?
Nov
29
comment Mathematica 9 Linking with R
I found a simple way to do this. Run["! R CMD BATCH <infile> <outfile> &"]; does this. We don't need RLink etc for this.
Nov
29
asked Mathematica 9 Linking with R
Nov
29
answered MathKernel and MathLM interaction
Nov
28
asked MathKernel and MathLM interaction
Nov
24
comment Vector computation instead of iterating over a list
I have edited it further. Now, as I asked, I am not paraphrasing what my code does, I am asking for a solution to remove/minimize the iterations. Any ideas? Thanks
Nov
24
revised Vector computation instead of iterating over a list
deleted 651 characters in body
Nov
23
revised Vector computation instead of iterating over a list
added 345 characters in body
Nov
23
asked Vector computation instead of iterating over a list
Nov
22
comment Optimization of correlation calculation
excellent.. that is exactly what I was looking for. thanks a lot!
Nov
22
accepted Optimization of correlation calculation
Nov
22
revised Optimization of correlation calculation
added 57 characters in body
Nov
21
revised Optimization of correlation calculation
explained in more detail