| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 11 months |
| seen | Mar 19 at 22:58 | |
| stats | profile views | 23 |
|
Dec 4 |
comment |
Reading in Huge Text Files @LeonidShifrin if you can make your comment an answer, I can see if it works and if it did, I can choose it as the best answer.Thanks. |
|
Dec 4 |
comment |
Reading in Huge Text Files your comment (that's what I meant,especially using BinaryReadList[] ) and also for the answer, how to do it when I call mathematica using -noprompt -script "test.m"? Thanks |
|
Dec 4 |
comment |
Reading in Huge Text Files The three links above especially the third one are related but not exactly what I need. I don't have a problem with memory. It is only the speed that I am concerned. Also, I was looking for something like if I could tell mathematica that those are going to be numbers, is it possible that it will save time? For eg: in R, it does help a lot.@LeonidShifrin can you please explain your answer? Sorry, I am not able to understand. |
|
Dec 4 |
asked | Reading in Huge Text Files |
|
Dec 3 |
accepted | MathKernel and MathLM interaction |
|
Dec 3 |
revised |
MathKernel and MathLM interaction added 307 characters in body |
|
Nov 29 |
comment |
Mathematica 9 Linking with R @LeonidShifrin - ReadList[] seems to do that. It will wait until the job is done despite the '&' but Run seems to work fine (on mac) |
|
Nov 29 |
comment |
Mathematica 9 Linking with R @Leonid - I am not an expert in mathematica. So, I don't know what you mean, but I tried the above one and it works for me. Mine was a mac machine. I am going to try on the Linux machine and if it does work there too, I'll make this as an answer. You are the one who developed the RLink thing right? Can you please tell me if there are any other ways to do this? |
|
Nov 29 |
comment |
Mathematica 9 Linking with R I found a simple way to do this. Run["! R CMD BATCH <infile> <outfile> &"]; does this. We don't need RLink etc for this. |
|
Nov 29 |
asked | Mathematica 9 Linking with R |
|
Nov 29 |
answered | MathKernel and MathLM interaction |
|
Nov 28 |
asked | MathKernel and MathLM interaction |
|
Nov 24 |
comment |
Vector computation instead of iterating over a list I have edited it further. Now, as I asked, I am not paraphrasing what my code does, I am asking for a solution to remove/minimize the iterations. Any ideas? Thanks |
|
Nov 24 |
revised |
Vector computation instead of iterating over a list deleted 651 characters in body |
|
Nov 23 |
revised |
Vector computation instead of iterating over a list added 345 characters in body |
|
Nov 23 |
asked | Vector computation instead of iterating over a list |
|
Nov 22 |
comment |
Optimization of correlation calculation excellent.. that is exactly what I was looking for. thanks a lot! |
|
Nov 22 |
accepted | Optimization of correlation calculation |
|
Nov 22 |
revised |
Optimization of correlation calculation added 57 characters in body |
|
Nov 21 |
revised |
Optimization of correlation calculation explained in more detail |