| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Naples, Italy | |
| age | 25 | |
| visits | member for | 11 months |
| seen | May 8 at 0:28 | |
| stats | profile views | 47 |
|
Jan 21 |
comment |
What's the most “functional” way to do Cholesky decomposition? I guess it's because my code fails to work whenever a zero has been previously computed on the leading diagonal of the lower triangular matrix. I should have added an exception, but I was probably too lazy to do it at the time. :D I'm just wondering if there are any precision issues involved or if you are actually "supposed to" have a zero in that element, though. |
|
Dec 25 |
asked | Under what conditions does FinancialData return a ::notent message? |
|
Oct 2 |
accepted | Manipulating an arbitrary-precision ContourPlot |
|
Oct 2 |
accepted | Dynamically choosing which Manipulate controls to use |
|
Sep 28 |
asked | Dynamically choosing which Manipulate controls to use |
|
Sep 27 |
accepted | Why is my animation so slow? |
|
Sep 25 |
comment |
Why is my animation so slow? @YvesKlett Not much, actually. |
|
Sep 25 |
revised |
Why is my animation so slow? added 312 characters in body |
|
Sep 25 |
comment |
Why is my animation so slow? The Simplify is actually one my futile attempts at making this thing run faster. I have noticed that the problem is probably in the ParametricPlot3D, as it is present even if I do not combine the two plots, only using the former. This might actually be meaningful. |
|
Sep 25 |
comment |
Why is my animation so slow? I use MMA 8.0.1.0 on an Intel i3 machine running Windows 7, with 4GB DDR3 and a NVIDIA GeForce 310M. I am not sure what kinds of Timings would be useful, since the problem is not that it takes time to start, but rather that the animation looks very much "stop motion"-like. However, I have noticed that it strongly depends on the number of "particles" whose trajectory I track: this slowing becomes negligible at a RandomSample of about 10. |
|
Sep 25 |
awarded | Constituent |
|
Sep 25 |
asked | Why is my animation so slow? |
|
Sep 11 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Aug 13 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Jul 24 |
comment |
Manipulating an arbitrary-precision ContourPlot Yeah, you are right. I hadn't thought about that. Since it is an input value, it is only as good as I can input it, and as it stands I can still use higher precision numbers via the input field under the slider if needed. Thanks! So, basically, there is no way to tell the Manipulate function to feed higher-precision numbers to its arguments "internally". Is this right? |
|
Jul 24 |
comment |
Manipulating an arbitrary-precision ContourPlot Won't SetPrecision get me "virtual" precision? |
|
Jul 24 |
revised |
Manipulating an arbitrary-precision ContourPlot Question renamed |
|
Jul 24 |
accepted | Getting an InterpolatingFunction from a ContourPlot |
|
Jul 24 |
accepted | Tridiagonal symmetric matrix eigenvalue using bisection |
|
Jul 24 |
asked | Manipulating an arbitrary-precision ContourPlot |