meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ND | |
| age | 29 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 4 months |
| seen | 1 min ago | |
| stats | profile views | 3,149 |
|
25m |
revised |
String encoding issue with Pythonika edited title |
|
35m |
reviewed | Approve suggested edit on Is it possible to import data from Google Analytics? |
|
51m |
comment |
String encoding issue with Pythonika Anyway, can you please give a full but minimal example that reproduces the problem? Post the precise code that you used, but reduce it to the essentials (a few lines). I'll take a look then. |
|
54m |
comment |
String encoding issue with Pythonika It sounds like this is a Pythonika problem/bug in the C layer connecting Mathematica and Python. Have you contacted the author of Pythonika? I'd say the question is on the border of being off-topic ... Unfortunately Pythonika is a bit sloppily implemented. It is a useful package, but it's a quick and dirty implementation. It would take considerably more work to implement a proper link. |
|
10h |
comment |
How can I conveniently call igraph through RLink? Thanks to Leonid for showing me how to use an external R installation on Mac! |
|
22h |
comment |
Why is StringExpression faster than RegularExpression? I tried time pcregrep --buffer-size=100000000 '(?ms)(?:(?ms)\(ICD-9-CM (.+?)\))' test.txt >/dev/null with pcregrep 8.32. This doesn't replace, it only matches, so it may not be correct. It takes 0.09 s here. |
|
22h |
comment |
Why is StringExpression faster than RegularExpression? Do you know what the ?: means? (I don't.) Maybe this is something worth mentioning to support then? |
|
22h |
comment |
Why is StringExpression faster than RegularExpression? The answer might be in StringPattern`PatternConvert[re]... which is not the same as re. |
|
22h |
comment |
Why is StringExpression faster than RegularExpression? I think you have v7. Just mentioning that it's the same in 9 too. |
|
1d |
comment |
Optimizing functions taking matrix argumentsReturn is not needed here and you can also drop the ;. This is not just nitpicking: while in this particular example it does not make a difference if you use it or not, when used inside some functions, it will return from those functions and not from your function. |
|
1d |
comment |
Telling mathematica to output * instead of space for multiplication, so I can copy as plain text For MATLAB, use what rm said. For C, use CForm. |
|
2d |
comment |
At what point should MLSetMessageHandler() be called? @ToddGayley I noticed now that the output of mprep has MLMDEFN( void, MLDefaultHandler, ( MLINK mlp, int message, int n)) if MLINTERFACE >= 3, which seems to be the default for Mathematica 9. It has unsigned long otherwise. |
|
2d |
comment |
At what point should MLSetMessageHandler() be called? @ToddGayley I was not aware that I need to send Abort[] explicitly when the return type is Manual, thanks for pointing that out! |
|
2d |
comment |
At what point should MLSetMessageHandler() be called? @ToddGayley I got the msghandler prototype from this documentation page. It uses int types. I checked mathlink.h as well, and if I followed the definitions back correctly (it's easy to make a mistake with all the #ifdefs) then MessageHandlerObject is a MLHandlerUPP which is a MLHandlerProcPtr which is defined as MLMPROC( void, MLHandlerProcPtr, (MLINK mlp, int m, int n));. Are you sure that the arguments should be unsigned long? |
|
May 20 |
comment |
At what point should MLSetMessageHandler() be called? What I ended up with eventually was defining a function callable from Mathematica that set up the handler. I think I could also move calling this function into the template file. |
|
May 20 |
comment |
At what point should MLSetMessageHandler() be called? @ToddGayley and Leonid: Thanks! Otherwise does the handler look fine, calling stdhandler for everything except Interrupt and Abort? It was not clear to me which messages must be handled, and how. |
|
May 20 |
awarded | export |
|
May 20 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
May 19 |
comment |
I want to draw a graph using a weighted Adjacency matrix How do you want the weights to modify the drawing of the graph? |
|
May 19 |
revised |
CUDAQ[] returns False in version 9 while True in version 8 edited title |
