meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | 27 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year |
| seen | May 17 at 21:10 | |
| stats | profile views | 328 |
|
Nov 16 |
comment |
Use output from Plot3D as an object in Graphics3D that I can transform As for why this works, you can always run FullForm[pic] and see that it's really just an expression of the form Graphics3d[....] which the front end interprets as an image. Therefore any manipulation that works on any normal expression also works on the graphics. |
|
Nov 16 |
answered | how to draw a moving point on a curve? |
|
Nov 16 |
comment |
how to draw a moving point on a curve? I really think you should review your last solution, what you are producing is the product of an invisible element and a graph, which is perfectly valid in Mathematica, but definitely not what someone reading the code expects. When you want to tie a dynamic expression to a different display form, you should properly use DynamicWrapper. |
|
Nov 15 |
answered | Prevent Part[] from trying to extract parts of symbolic expressions |
|
Nov 15 |
answered | Why is MapIndexed better than mapping over a range? |
|
Nov 14 |
answered | Dual-Grid Graph Paper With Mathematica? |
|
Nov 13 |
revised |
Get number of combinations without “forbidden patterns” added 215 characters in body |
|
Nov 13 |
comment |
Get number of combinations without “forbidden patterns” You don't need to go to strings to do this, DeleteCases[Tuples[{0, 1}, {8}], {_, 1, _, _, _, 0, _, _}] will work too. |
|
Nov 13 |
revised |
Get number of combinations without “forbidden patterns” added 111 characters in body |
|
Nov 13 |
comment |
Get number of combinations without “forbidden patterns” @J.M. So did I, this is why I added the second less direct approach which keeps the patterns unevaluated. This is essentially a recipe that allows late generation of the numbers, though it does suffer from overlap in the patterns. |
|
Nov 13 |
answered | Get number of combinations without “forbidden patterns” |
|
Nov 8 |
revised |
Converting expressions into functions added 259 characters in body |
|
Nov 8 |
revised |
Converting expressions into functions added 259 characters in body |
|
Nov 8 |
comment |
Converting expressions into functions @Szabolcs Yes, I might have written this out, I really just wanted to explain the reason behind why it doesn't work out and how you in general get around this. I feel like getting to know the concept of Hold and how it works is something which can save a lot of early frustration with using Mathematica. |
|
Nov 8 |
answered | Converting expressions into functions |
|
Nov 8 |
comment |
Self-referential list or table of buttons @MarkMcClure This point has been raised in cases where comments suggesting improvements lead to the improvement being implemented and therefore becoming moot. Not in cases where flaws are pointed out and the author argues back that since he's answer was accepted the flaw should be ignored. If you where to improve you answer based on the comment, then it would be moot and deletion would be natural. And again urging other users to delete comments because they don't suit you is in bad tasted in any case, as is posting comments with immediate deletion in mind. In such cases you should use the chat |
|
Nov 8 |
comment |
Self-referential list or table of buttons @MarkMcClure I never called your answer trash. I raised what I believe is a quite objective critique, that your answer will visually appear to solve the question, but in fact does not do what was asked for. I stand by that post, but feel forced to delete responses to any you delete. I would urge you not to urge users to delete their comments critiquing your solutions. And if ever you feel the need to state in a comment that you will delete it, I urge you to not post it all. |
|
Nov 8 |
answered | Self-referential list or table of buttons |
|
Nov 8 |
comment |
Self-referential list or table of buttons This is not actually an answer to the question. This is a list of buttons that when pressed will delete the first button in the list.The question was for a button capable of deleting itself. |
|
Nov 7 |
comment |
Non Commutative Multiply This answer mathematica.stackexchange.com/a/5458/1194 by Leonid Shifrin shows how it's possible to circumvent the orderless property of Times when applied to specific expressions, without having to remove it. |
