meta user
network profile
| bio | website | stackoverflow.com/users/… |
|---|---|---|
| location | United States | |
| age | 29 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 5 months |
| seen | 10 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 13 |
|
May 23 |
comment |
Converting polygon to graph in V7 @jnthn: Interesting, I think I missed the errors because I was working in 9.0.1. My apologies, as I did have access to 7.0 for testing. Glad that I was able to help. |
|
May 22 |
comment |
Converting polygon to graph in V7 The syntax of Graph in Combinatorica is Graph[e, v, opts], not Graph[v, e] as with the new built-in Graph. |
|
May 22 |
answered | Converting polygon to graph in V7 |
|
Mar 20 |
comment |
Can Enterprise Edition really encrypt code for distribution via CDF? @AndreasLauschke: Sarcasm noted... Your attachment to security-through-obscurity is misguided, and you should know it. There is no need for you to apologize; I had a feeling the "5 lines" wouldn't be forthcoming, for one reason or another. At the very least, you should send whatever info you might have to WRI so that they might have a better shot at fixing the problem you vehemently allege and (so far) provide absolutely no evidence for. |
|
Mar 19 |
comment |
Can Enterprise Edition really encrypt code for distribution via CDF? @AndreasLauschke: re (b), there is no provided function in M that can convert encoded files back to their original form, and setting Locked/ReadProtected prevents inspection of symbol definitions in the kernel. what 5 lines of "pro M code" are you talking about? |
|
Feb 28 |
answered | Storing result from nested Table in a File for further computations |
|
Jan 18 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Sep 29 |
answered | How to display equations without Mathematica simplifying them? |
|
Jun 3 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Jun 3 |
revised |
Export to text file Added use of the second argument of ScientificForm to get the amount of digits the OP was looking for. |
|
Jun 3 |
answered | Export to text file |
|
May 27 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
May 20 |
answered | nested numerical integration: not valid limits? |
|
Mar 10 |
comment |
Listing subgraphs of G isomorphic to SubG I think you meant that GI is not known to be NP-complete, as it is known to be in NP. |
|
Jan 19 |
comment |
Difficulties in creating strict and robust equivalence between two symbols using the Notation package If you type (and evaluate) the definition of f in a notebook whose InputAutoReplacements option is appropriately set, then your approach works. If the definition already exists (e.g. in some other notebook where the InputAutoReplacements option was not appropriately set when the definition was entered), then this approach does not work. Please also note that re-evaluating the cell containing the definition doesn't help, even if InputAutoReplacements is then set appropriately; it would be necessary to actually re-type [parts of] the definition with InputAutoReplacements appropriately set. |
|
Jan 18 |
comment |
Difficulties in creating strict and robust equivalence between two symbols using the Notation package This is good, but it does not work if, for example, there is an existing definition like f[x_]:=beta^x. Entering beta=3 (which properly replaces) and then f[2] does not give the desired 9, but still just beta^2. (By the way, though I'm pointing this out, I don't know how to get around this) |
|
Jan 18 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Jan 18 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
