network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Massachusetts | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 1 month |
| seen | Jan 9 at 4:55 | |
| stats | profile views | 8 |
I'm a grad-student in Astrophysics, focusing on theory, and generally studying high-energy transients.
|
May 18 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
May 17 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Oct 14 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Oct 14 |
comment |
Notebook formatting - easier descriptions for equations and results? Awesome. This should be a feature in mathematica... who do you write a letter to? |
|
Oct 14 |
accepted | Notebook formatting - easier descriptions for equations and results? |
|
Oct 14 |
comment |
Notebook formatting - easier descriptions for equations and results? That was the only functionality I could think of, and I generally don't need that. I'm satisfied! Thanks @Mr.Wizard |
|
Oct 13 |
comment |
Notebook formatting - easier descriptions for equations and results? @Mr.Wizard, first - yes! The syntax looks great! Second - I just played with it a little more, and I don't think there is actually any 'Output' functionality that I'm missing (i.e. nothing that I generally do seems to require specific 'Output' cells). Unless you have an example of somewhere where this might be a big problem --- I think its a done deal. |
|
Oct 13 |
comment |
Notebook formatting - easier descriptions for equations and results? This is quite nice! Thanks @Mr.Wizard. As you point out -- creating actual "Output" is pretty important, so I haven't accepted this as 'the answer' just yet. |
|
Oct 12 |
comment |
Notebook formatting - easier descriptions for equations and results? Yeah, still cumbersome --- but it's definitely a step in the right direction! Thanks @Jagra |
|
Oct 12 |
comment |
Notebook formatting - easier descriptions for equations and results? Thanks @LeonidShifrin, that does provide the resulting look I wanted, but its again far too laborious to be convenient |
|
Oct 12 |
asked | Notebook formatting - easier descriptions for equations and results? |
|
May 23 |
accepted | Select Solution with real (positive, etc) coefficients - ignoring variables |
|
May 22 |
comment |
Select Solution with real (positive, etc) coefficients - ignoring variables Thanks, this works... I'm a little disappointed if its the cleanest solution Mathematica can muster |
|
May 22 |
comment |
Select Solution with real (positive, etc) coefficients - ignoring variables The exact same problem results from NSolve... it can't handle those criteria for variables. |
|
May 22 |
asked | Select Solution with real (positive, etc) coefficients - ignoring variables |
|
Apr 22 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Apr 22 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Apr 22 |
accepted | How to invert an integral equation |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
How to invert an integral equation Just implemented this and it works well. Using a simple finite-difference routine to calculate the derivative of 'F' is computationally trivial compared to the iterative numerical integrations. |
|
Apr 21 |
comment |
How to invert an integral equation Thanks @belisarius, but my g2 can't be integrated numerically. I.E. I have something like `f[x_]:=g1[x]*NIntegrate[g2[t],{t,0,x}]' and I get the above error |
