| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | University of Würzburg, Germany | |
| age | 25 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 4 months |
| seen | Apr 25 at 13:39 | |
| stats | profile views | 648 |
- Environment: Mathematica 9, Ubuntu 11.04, GHC + current platform
- Job: Physics student
- Languages (fluently): German, English, Mathematica, Haskell, C++ and one that shall not be mentioned
|
Apr 24 |
comment |
Setting a lower limit on calculation time @Mr.Wizard The answers provided don't really add anything to my naive implementation. When I asked this, I wondered whether maybe there's a built-in function to handle this (plus all possible special cases I could think of). |
|
Apr 20 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
Feb 26 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
Feb 15 |
awarded | Good Answer |
|
Feb 14 |
comment |
Find condition under which variables fall away @Szabolcs Edited the question, should be clearer now |
|
Feb 14 |
comment |
Find condition under which variables fall away Is there a way I can generalize this so that a can only depend on b and nothing else present in expr? (I edited my question to make this a bit clearer) |
|
Feb 14 |
comment |
Find condition under which variables fall away Thanks for the reply. However, this doesn't ensure a depends only on b and not on any other variables in expr, a thing I didn't write clearly enough in my question. (I edited it a little now) |
|
Feb 14 |
revised |
Find condition under which variables fall away added 220 characters in body |
|
Feb 14 |
comment |
Find condition under which variables fall away I currently have only two parameters. (A solution with more than that would be nice, but I don't strictly need it.) |
|
Feb 14 |
asked | Find condition under which variables fall away |
|
Feb 10 |
awarded | Favorite Question |
|
Jan 26 |
accepted | Custom package development: Basic steps |
|
Jan 17 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Dec 8 |
awarded | Good Question |
|
Dec 5 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Dec 4 |
comment |
Plotting the solution of a vector stochastic differential equation Oh, I wasn't expecting you used brute force here. |
|
Dec 4 |
comment |
Plotting the solution of a vector stochastic differential equation How did you get the [[2,1]] part? A little more explanation and this would make a nice remark. |
|
Dec 4 |
accepted | Plotting the solution of a vector stochastic differential equation |
|
Dec 4 |
comment |
Plotting the solution of a vector stochastic differential equation Ah, I forgot looking at TemporalData, of which I assumed it was some internal form unsuitable for direct manipulation. Turns out the documentation on it is quite complex. |
|
Dec 4 |
revised |
stochastic-calculus wiki excerpt added 109 characters in body |