0
votes
0answers
48 views

Always the same problem with Conjugate [duplicate]

I want to compute something like : ...
0
votes
1answer
48 views

Simplifying complex expressions

I'm trying to work with complexes and I want Mathematica to know that all variables are real unless I explicitly assigned the variable with an I so I wrote: ...
3
votes
1answer
200 views

How to get rid of all complex numbers and functions?

For almost esthetical reasons, I always have been fascinated by infinite sums of series and I always wonder if theyhave a closed form. A couple of days ago, I found on MSE a question related to the ...
0
votes
0answers
62 views

Alternate method of conjugation using replaceall

Mathematica really struggles to simplify complex conjugates of complicated expressions - even given assumptions for every symbol in the expression being real. Often times I've found that I can ...
0
votes
3answers
142 views

Conjugate and simplify

I want to get a cosine from taking the real part of a complex exponential: $cos(x) = Re(exp(i x))$. What I do in Mathematica is ...
0
votes
1answer
128 views

Simplifying Complex Numbers that contain physical units

I am trying to evaluate the following: Simplify[Meter Nano Re[(a + I b)/(Meter Nano)], Assumptions -> Element[{a, b}, Reals]] However, Mathematica returns: ...
6
votes
1answer
143 views

How to reduce expressions with complex coefficients in the form of a+0.*I

I'm trying to get an eigenvalue equation in Mathematica, and the result is an expression with coefficients of the form a + 0. I. For example, Is there any clever ...
4
votes
1answer
483 views

Does the Im function work with symbolic arguments?

Does the Im function work with symbolic arguments? ...
11
votes
2answers
3k views

How to specify assumptions before evaluation?

If I request mathematica evaluate an integral for me, I'll often get a more general ConditionalExpression than I want. Example : ...