# Inverse Laplace transform not obtained

I can't seem to be able to compute the inverse Laplace transform of a Laplace transform:

LaplaceTransform[x *  Sqrt[l^2 - x^2], x, s]

Out[27]= -(1/(32 π))
Sqrt[-(1/l^2)] l^4 (l^2)^(3/2)
s^3 MeijerG[{{-(3/2)}, {}}, {{-3, -(3/2), -1}, {}}, -(1/16)
l^4 s^4 Sign[Im[Log[-(1/l^2)]]], 2] Sign[Im[Log[-(1/l^2)]]]


But if I try to do the reverse:

InverseLaplaceTransform[-(1/(32 π)) Sqrt[-(1/l^2)]
l^4 (l^2)^(3/2)
s^3 MeijerG[{{-(3/2)}, {}}, {{-3, -(3/2), -1}, {}}, -(1/16)
l^4 s^4 Sign[Im[Log[-(1/l^2)]]], 2] Sign[
Im[Log[-(1/l^2)]]], s, x]

Out[29]= -(1/(32 π))
Sqrt[-(1/l^2)] l^4 (l^2)^(3/2)
InverseLaplaceTransform[
s^3 MeijerG[{{-(3/2)}, {}}, {{-3, -(3/2), -1}, {}}, -(1/16)
l^4 s^4 Sign[Im[Log[-(1/l^2)]]], 2], s, x] Sign[
Im[Log[-(1/l^2)]]]


Shouldn't this evaluate to the original? As to why I'd want to do this: I am trying to solve an equation using Laplace transforms.

-
Things like this actually happen far more frequently than you'd expect: operation so-and-so is easy to do, but the inverse is not too easy... – J. M. Jun 27 '12 at 23:50
I agree, but is there an alternative to Laplace transforms for solving complicated equations? – highBandWidth Jun 28 '12 at 0:07
@J.M. Like marriage ... – belisarius has settled Jun 28 '12 at 1:02
@belisarius ... or a lobotomy. :-p – Mr.Wizard Jun 28 '12 at 7:34
1. Convert it to a differential equation if possible. 2. If you cannot get a symbolic solution for the Laplace transform, then try getting a numerical solution. Write out the integral transform for a Laplace transform and try to apply it numerically to your equations using NIntegrate. – Searke Jun 28 '12 at 13:18