Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematica Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Mathematica. It's 100% free, no registration required.

When I solve this equation in Mathematica 8, I can get the right answer, but with some uncomfortable warnings.


Solve[-26.81 == 194 k + k*l*32.9 && 22.2 == -74 k + k*l* 59.7, {k, l}]


Solve::ratnz: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients. The answer was obtained by solving a corresponding exact system and numericizing the result. >>

If I transform the above equation to this form, then it works fine, but this is not convenient:

{k, kl/k} /. Solve[-26.81 == 194 k + kl*32.9 && 22.2 == -74 k + kl* 59.7, {k, kl}]

So my question is, how can I get rid of such warnings?

share|improve this question
There's Quiet[], but it's cheating in a certain sense... –  J. M. May 26 '12 at 14:05
add comment

4 Answers

up vote 9 down vote accepted

You can get rid of the warning by converting everything to exact numbers yourself before passing the equation to Solve (the warning message suggests that this is what Solve does itself):

In[2]:= Rationalize[-26.81 == 194 k + k*l*32.9 &&  22.2 == -74 k + k*l*59.7]
Out[2]= -(2681/100) == 194 k + (329 k l)/10 && 111/5 == -74 k + (597 k l)/10

In[3]:= Solve[%]
Out[3]= {{l -> -(2322860/2330937), k -> -(2330937/14016400)}}

In[4]:= N[%]
Out[4]= {{l -> -0.996535, k -> -0.166301}}

Solve (like all symbolic manipulation function) is meant to be used with exact numbers where roundoff errors are not an issue. For solving the equation numerically, use NSolve:

In[5]:= NSolve[-26.81 == 194 k + k*l*32.9 && 22.2 == -74 k + k*l*59.7]
Out[5]= {{l -> -0.996535, k -> -0.166301}}
share|improve this answer
add comment

An alternative method would be to replace all inexact values with named parameters and replace afterwards, like this:

Solve[a == 194 k + k*l*b && c == -74 k + k*l*d, {k, l}]

{{k -> (-b c + a d)/(74 b + 194 d), l -> (2 (37 a + 97 c))/(-b c + a d)}}

% /. {a -> -26.81, b -> 32.9, c -> 22.2, d -> 59.7}

{{k -> -0.1663006906, l -> -0.9965348699}}

To automatize this process I introduce a function inexactSolve that, when placed against your complaining Solve, finds all inexact numbers, converts them to an inert function, solves the resulting equation and converts back.

SetAttributes[inexactSolve, HoldFirst]
inexactSolve[expr_Solve] := 
   ReleaseHold@ Replace[Hold[expr], a_?InexactNumberQ :> inert[ToString[a]], Infinity] 
     /. inert[a_String] :> ToExpression[a]


inexactSolve@Solve[-26.81 == 194 k + k*l*32.9 && 22.2 == -74 k + k*l*59.7, {k, l}]

{{k -> -0.1663006906, l -> -0.9965348699}}

How it works will be clear if I leave away the /. inert[a_String] :> ToExpression[a] part. The result then is:

Mathematica graphics.

Of course, this may be considered as shooting sparrows with a cannon, but that can be very effective ;-)

share|improve this answer
May I propose: inexactSolve[expr_Solve] := Block[{Identity}, Unevaluated[expr] /. a_?InexactNumberQ :> Identity[a] ] –  Mr.Wizard Dec 17 '12 at 0:17
@Mr.Wizard That doesn't seem to work. It yields OP's original error message, at least on my system. –  Sjoerd C. de Vries Dec 17 '12 at 13:30
@Mr.Wizard The closest I get when trying to work with your code is inexactSolve[expr_Solve] := ReleaseHold@ Block[{Identity}, Replace[Hold[expr], a_?InexactNumberQ :> Identity[ToString[a]], Infinity]] /. Identity[a_String] :> ToExpression[a]. Which means I get rid of inert. It seems that both the conversion to string and Replace with Infinity parameter are necessary. –  Sjoerd C. de Vries Dec 17 '12 at 13:36
add comment

If you use NSolve[] instead of Solve[] (since indeed you are using inexact numbers like 26.81 in your equations), the warning you speak of should not show up.

Alternatively, you can wrap your Solve[] line in a Quiet[], but that is not a strategy I can recommend in good conscience.

share|improve this answer
add comment

I had the same issue and using NSolve didn't work. I got similar message:

NSolve::ratnz: NSolve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients. The answer was obtained by solving a corresponding exact system and numericizing the result.

I found a solution here:

Error/warning when using NSolve for simple equation

It proposes using Rationalize

share|improve this answer
Rationalize was also used in the accepted answer on this page given by Szabolcs. You may have missed that. –  Sjoerd C. de Vries Apr 9 at 13:38
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.