Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematica Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Mathematica. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I wish to produce an image with more than one composite graphics objects which have been modified using Rotate. I feel this should not be difficult, but haven't yet found a solution.

A simple example using only Disk illustrates the problem.

e1 = Rotate[Graphics[Disk[{0, 0}, {1/3, 1/4}]], \[Pi]/3];
e2 = Rotate[Graphics[Disk[{0, 0}, {1/3, 1/4}]], \[Pi]/7];

The following attempt fails:


Show::gcomb: Could not combine the graphics objects in Show[]

How should this best be achieved ?

share|improve this question
I think this is a reasonable question and ought not be closed. –  mfvonh Aug 20 at 18:27
Perhaps you can also make use of this: How to create custom Graphics primitive? –  Jens Aug 20 at 18:50
Would'nt be easier to just change the order of Graphics and Rotate? Like this: e1 = Graphics[Rotate[{Blue, Opacity[.75], Disk[{0, 0}, {1/3, 1/4}]}, \[Pi]/3]]; e2 = Graphics[Rotate[{Red, Opacity[.75], Disk[{0, 0}, {1/3, 1/4}]}, \[Pi]/7]]; Show[{e1, e2}] !Mathematica graphics –  Nasser Aug 21 at 2:09

5 Answers 5

up vote 12 down vote accepted

The trick is just to get rid of the internal Graphics heads and then wrap the full expression in Graphics:

{e1, e2} /. Graphics -> Identity // Graphics

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
A very simple and surprising trick. Of course +1. –  eldo Aug 20 at 18:42
Hopefully master @kguler is proud of his padawan's use of Identity :) –  mfvonh Aug 20 at 18:49
@mfvonh, nice... +1 of course :) –  kguler Aug 20 at 18:56
this works when Graphics has a single argument (e.g. no graphics options in e1 and e2). Otherwise, if, say e2 has the option ImageSize->300, we need something less clean -- like {e1, e2} /. Rotate[Graphics[x_, y_], r_] :> Graphics[Rotate[x, r], y] // Show –  kguler Aug 20 at 19:03
@kguler I think that should be y___, otherwise that seems like the best solution yet. –  Mr.Wizard Aug 21 at 10:06


As noted in the comments by @pickett, the function showF in the original post does not preserve the relative positions of the inset graphics. I am not sure if it is possible to fix showF to address this issue. So, instead, I suggest an alternative approach using

show2F := Show[# /. Rotate[Graphics[x_, y___], r__] :> Graphics[Rotate[x, r], y],
              PlotRange -> All, ImagePadding -> Scaled[.025]] &

show2F@{e1, e2, e3}

enter image description here

Original post

An alternative approach similar to @mfvonh's replacement trick: Wrap inner graphics with Inset and the whole thing with Graphics

showF := Graphics[# /. Graphics -> Composition[Inset, Graphics]] &

or using the new Version10 syntax (thanks: @rojo)



g1 = Graphics[{Red, Disk[{0, 0}, {1/3, 1/4}]}, ImageSize -> 250];
g2 = Graphics[{Blue, Opacity[.5], Disk[{0, 0}, {1/3, 1/4}]}, ImageSize -> 200];
g3 = Graphics[{Thickness[.03], Line[{{0, -1/2}, {0, 1}}], 
             {Blue, Line[{{0, -1/2}, {1, 1}}]}, 
             First@Plot[x Sin[6 x + 4], {x, -1, 1}, Axes -> False, 
                       PlotStyle -> {Thickness[.02], Orange}]}, ImageSize -> 250];
Row[{g1, g2, g3}]

enter image description here

e1 = Rotate[g1, Pi / 3];
e2 = Rotate[g2, Pi / 7];
e3 = Rotate[g3, Pi / 2];
Row[{e1, e2, e3}]

enter image description here

showF @ {e1, e2, e3}

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
My first upvote "just for laughs" - a brilliant late coup :) –  eldo Aug 20 at 20:28
thank you @eldo :) ... –  kguler Aug 20 at 20:34
... and @mfvonh for the key idea. –  kguler Aug 20 at 20:35
No cows this time? ;) –  rm -rf Aug 20 at 22:11
+1. Similarly, Graphics@*ReplaceAll[Graphics->Inset@*Graphics] –  Rojo Aug 21 at 7:38

mfvonh's trick is nice, but I think it should be said that the normal approach is to rotate graphics primitives inside the Graphics wrapper.

  Rotate[Disk[{0, 0}, {1/3, 1/4}], π/3], 
  Rotate[Disk[{0, 0}, {1/3, 1/4}], π/7]},
  ImageSize -> Small]


share|improve this answer
Isn't that what mfvonn does when he changes Graphics to Identity? –  Rojo Aug 21 at 7:41
@Rojo. Yes, but it's rather the long way around the barn (as we say in the US), don't you think. This post is to make sure beginners see the way it normally done when they read this questions and its answers. –  m_goldberg Aug 21 at 12:15

As with some of the other approaches, the following does not maintain relative positions.

e1 = Rotate[Graphics[{Blue, Opacity[.75],
     Disk[{0, 0}, {1/3, 1/4}]}], \[Pi]/3];
e2 = Rotate[Graphics[{Red, Opacity[.75],
     Disk[{0, 0}, {1/3, 1/4}]}], \[Pi]/7];

 Rasterize[#, Background -> None] & /@
  {e1, e2}]

enter image description here

share|improve this answer

Yet another method is to use Overlay. Borrowing Bob Hanlon's example:

e1 = Rotate[Graphics[{Blue, Opacity[.75],
     Disk[{0, 0}, {1/3, 1/4}]}], π/3];
e2 = Rotate[Graphics[{Red, Opacity[.75],
     Disk[{0, 0}, {1/3, 1/4}]}], π/7];

Overlay[{e1, e2}]

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
With the caveat, as was noted in the comments to my deleted answer that at once point included Overlay, that the objects lose their relative positions. –  Pickett Aug 21 at 9:22
@Pickett True, but kguler's Inset solution has the same problem as currently written. I still think this is useful. –  Mr.Wizard Aug 21 at 10:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.