Mathematica Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Mathematica. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have the following problem. Consider expression


There is an obvious ambiguity in the definition of f related to multivaluedness of the square root. Two possible interpretations for f are $x-2y$ or $2y-x$.

My needs require to work with power series expansions of expressions like f. When asked to perform a series expansion Mathematica automatically chooses a branch

In[106]:= Series[f, {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 1}] // Normal

Out[106]= -x + 2 y

I'm OK with that since I can adjust the sign of the square root manually and use -f instead of f if needed. The problem is that Mathematica is not consistent in her choice. For example, evaluate

In[107]:= Series[f, {y, 0, 1}, {x, 0, 1}] // Normal

Out[107]= x - 2 y 

now it's the other branch!

In a real task I have a quite complicated function depending on many parameters under the square root. When I work with its series expansions naively, as described above, things just go wrong. How can the problem be handled?

Any help is appreciated!

share|improve this question
not clear what you are after. Do you want both expressions, or do you want a single result that is somehow consistent to you? maybe an example of where this is a real issue would help – george2079 Jun 23 '14 at 13:09

I just saw this trick here, page 2 and decided to try it on this problem. Another reference that describes this method is here

The idea is to convert multiple Taylor series in $x,y$ to one variable $t$ as follows

   f[t_] := Sqrt[((x0 + t x) - 2 (y0 + t y))^2];

Now $f(t)$ can be expanded in Taylor as single variable to avoid the issue at hand.

The trick is to set t->1 afterwords and then take the limit of x0->0 and y0->0 since we are expanding around these which are zeros. Doing so, gives both solutions. Now depending on if we take the limit of x0->0 or y0->0 we get one of the solutions returned by Mathematica's Series!

But this way, you obtain both limits and then you can decide which one to use.

Clear[x0, t, x, y0, y]
f[t_] := Sqrt[((x0 + t x) - 2 (y0 + t y))^2];
r = Normal[Series[f[t], {t, 0, 1}]] /. t -> 1;
r = Simplify@Expand@ComplexExpand[%];
r = Limit[r, {x0 -> 0, y0 -> 0}]; %had to take limit 2 times to do it!
Limit[r, {y0 -> 0, x0 -> 0}]

Mathematica graphics

Compare the above to

f[x_, y_] := Sqrt[(x - 2 y)^2];
Normal[Series[f[x, y], {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 1}]] // Normal
(*-x + 2 y*)
Normal[Series[f[x, y], {y, 0, 1}, {x, 0, 1}]] // Normal
(* x - 2 y *)

So, the single variable trick gives you both solutions. It seems Series takes the limit based on the order of the variables. Not sure about that. I can't explain exactly why Series did that, but I do not think it is a branch cut issue as you can see.

share|improve this answer
Similar approaches show up in MSE and related forums. See 1, 2, 3, 4 (there are probably others but I stop counting once I run out of thumbs). – Daniel Lichtblau Jun 23 '14 at 16:32

While I'm not sure how one might expect Mathematica to pick the "right" result, if getting the possible results gets you part way there. a simpler way to do this is:

mySeries[f_, p_] := DeleteDuplicates@(Normal@Series[f, Sequence @@ #] & /@ Permutations[p])

f = Sqrt[(x - 2 y)^2]
p = {{x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 1}}
mySeries[f, p]

(* {-x + 2 y, x - 2 y} *)
share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.