Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematica Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Mathematica. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is a question about the use of symbols in Minimize and how to persuade Mathematica to treat them in a specific way (as integers or rationals) that I have not been able to achieve, but analysis of the results of Minimize suggests ought to be possible.

The context is this: I have the following equation and wish to find the minimum value of t0 in closed form for a, b in terms of vx, vy, vz without numeric values (as you will see below I can find a minima for specific numeric values of vx, vy, vz).

t0 = g (-vz Cos[a] - vy Cos[b] Sin[a] - vx Sin[b] Sin[a])

In the code block below, you will see in part 1 an attempt to do this symbolically in terms of the ratio c/d assigned to the key variables vx, vy, vz; Minimize will not do it. In part 2 vx, vy and vz are given a specific exact numerical values and Minimize then delivers a result. However, inspection of the result clearly shows (thanks to the relative primaility of the numerators of vx etc.) that Mathematica is handling the numerators separately.


Block[{g, vx, vy, vz, t0, mint,  a, b , c, d},
 t0 = g (-vz Cos[a] - vy Cos[b] Sin[a] - 
     vx Sin[b] Sin[a]); (* eqn to minimize *)
  g = 1/Sqrt[1 - (vx^2 + vx^2 + vx^2)]; (* common initialisation *)
 (* Part 1 *)
 vx = vy = vz = c/d; (* would like vx etc. elements of Rationals... how? *)
 mint = Minimize[{t0, 0 <= b < 2 Pi, 0 <= a < Pi}, {b, a}, 
   Reals]; (* fails *)
 Print["t0 minimum = ", mint];
 mint = Minimize[{t0, 0 <= b < 2 Pi, 0 <= a < Pi, , 
    c ∈ Integers, d ∈ Integers}, {b, a}, 
   Reals]; (* fails *)
 Print["t0 minimum = ", mint];
 (* Part 2 *)
 vx = 7/100; vy = 3/100; 
 vz = 11/100; (* all v made specific rationals *)
 mint = Minimize[{t0, 0 <= b < 2 Pi, 0 <= a < Pi}, {b, a}, 
   Reals]; (* succeeds *)
 Print["t0 minimum = ", mint];

Result of Part 2:

t0 minimum = {(1/Sqrt[9853])100 (-(11/100) Cos[2 ArcTan[1/58 
                    (-11 Sqrt[58]+Sqrt[10382])]]-3/100 
                Cos[2 ArcTan[1/7 (-3+Sqrt[58])]] Sin[2 ArcTan[1/58 
                    (-11 Sqrt[58]+Sqrt[10382])]]-7/100 Sin[2 ArcTan[1/7 (-3+Sqrt[58])]] 
                Sin[2 ArcTan[1/58 (-11 Sqrt[58]+Sqrt[10382])]]),
                {b -> 2 ArcTan[1/7 (-3+Sqrt[58])], 
                 a -> 2 ArcTan[1/58 (-11 Sqrt[58] + Sqrt[10382])]}}

where the coefficients are clearly related to the values of the denominators vx etc. as follows:

58 = 7^2 + 3^2
10382 = (7^2+3^2+11^2) * (7^2 +3^2)

Question Is it possible to perform the minimisation symbolically and if so, how? Can one declare vx etc. as Rationals directly or by assignment as the ratio of two Integers? I have tried including equivalent constraints within Minimize (one example given in code above), but to no effect.

I also tried defining a function accepting appropriate Integers and Reals, also without success.

f[a_Real, b_Real, c_Integer, d_Integer] := 
 g (-vz Cos[a] - vy Cos[b] Sin[a] - vx Sin[b] Sin[a]); 
vx = vy = vz = c/d;
Print["Minimize by defined function of integers = ", 
 Minimize[{f[a, b, c, d], 0 <= b < 2 Pi, 0 <= a < Pi}, {b, a}, 

I believe that the answer to this may also have a bearing on the use of Solve and simialr functions.

share|improve this question
Thank you for the edits: I have noted what you did and will try to do likewise myself next time. Info on/links to info on how to do other than hyperlinks to documentation (e.g. grey background on variable names in text) would be welcome. –  Julian Moore Mar 27 '14 at 11:58
not sure why this old question got bumped, but if you solve the problem directly (with Reduce ) you'll see that the restriction on the parameters being rational doesn't enter into it,ie its a moot question. –  george2079 May 27 '14 at 18:30

1 Answer 1

It is very compute extreme-value problem in analysis.For example

Minimize[a x^2 + b x + c, x]

This this simple than your cases.It just have one extreme point If a!=0. But in your case, consider 0 <= b < 2 Pi, 0 <= a <2 Pi(the period of a and b is 2Pi, so we don't need consider boundary.Also we don't consider g).

t0[vx_, vy_, vz_] := -vz Cos[a] - vy Cos[b] Sin[a] - vx Sin[b] Sin[a];
ExtremePoint[vx_, vy_, vz_] := 
    Solve[{D[t0[vx, vy, vz], a] == 0, D[t0[vx, vy, vz], b] == 0}, {a, 
        b}][[All, All, 2]] /. {C[1] -> i, C[2] -> j}, {i, -1, 1, 1}, {j, -1, 1, 1}] 
        // Flatten[#, 2] &, 
  Function[{a, b}, (Not[NumericQ[a]] || 0 <= a <= 2 Pi) && (Not[NumericQ[b]] ||
     0 <= b <= 2 Pi)] @@ # &]
ExtremePoint[1, 1, 1] // Length
ExtremePoint[vx, vy, vz] // Length

If vx=vy=vz=1,we just need consider 10 points.But if we don't know any about vx vy vz, we need consider 54 points ,and they all are symbolic expressions!

But there is a good thing that the values in extreme points is too simple.

t0[vx, vy, vz] /. {a -> #1, b -> #2} & @@@ ExtremePoint[vx, vy, vz] 
   //Simplify // DeleteDuplicates 
(*{Sqrt[vx^2 + vy^2 + vz^2], -Sqrt[vx^2 + vy^2 + vz^2], -vz, vz}*)

So the minimize of function is

min[vx_, vy_, vz_] := -Sqrt[vx^2 + vy^2 + vz^2]

let us test it

testdata = RandomReal[{-10, 10}, {10, 3}]
min @@@ testdata
Minimize[{t0[##],0<=a<=Pi,0<=b<=2Pi}, {a, b}] & @@@ testdata
Minimize[{t0[##],0<=a<=2Pi,0<=b<=2Pi}, {a, b}] & @@@ testdata

It is just correct when we allow 0<=a<=2Pi because we don't consider the boundary(For example a=0)

Minimize[{t0[6.057, 0.972, 3.014], 0 < a < Pi}, {a, b}]

the position of extreme points is complex.

{t0[vx, vy, vz] /. {a -> #1, b -> #2}, {a->#1,a-> #2}} & @@@
     ExtremePoint[vx, vy, vz]// Simplify // DeleteDuplicates;
Select[%, #[[1]] == -Sqrt[vx^2 + vy^2 + vz^2] &] // Length
share|improve this answer
Thanks... I will look at this in detail in the morning. In the meantime, just to mention that I also tried the derivative approach to extrema (with g) and maybe I was too impatient... I only allowed Mma about 10 minutes to solve. We shall see! Good food for thought. –  Julian Moore Mar 28 '14 at 17:18
I appreciate VERY much what you have done and I am learning a lot from it, but I was trying to understand how Minimize could work with numeric rationals and not symbolic rationals when numeric numerator and denominator elements seemed to propagate cleanly through Minimize. I did not mean to ask "how to minimise" in general, I mean "How to use Minimize" in this case. (and if it can't be used, to understand specifically why not, general complexity would be too non-specific an answer.) I would appreciate advice from anyone on whether to close this Q and re-ask or do something else –  Julian Moore Mar 30 '14 at 9:09

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.