Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematica Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Mathematica. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm having trouble getting customized derivatives (defined using upvalues) to behave in sane ways. By this I mean that I'd like to define a derivative using an upvalue and then have Mathematica apply all derivative rules it normally would, delegating to the upvalues when appropriate. For example.

X /: D[X[x_], y_] := A KroneckerDelta[x,y]
Y /: D[Y[x_], y_] := B KroneckerDelta[x,y]
D[X[x], x]        (* Gives the Expected Answer:  A *)
D[X[x] + Y[x], x] (* Desired Output:   A + B  *)
D[X[x] Y[x], x]   (* Desired Output:   A Y[x] + X[x] B   *)

For the latter two, I get X'[x] + Y'[x] and Y[x] X'[x] + X[x] Y'[x]. I'm not understanding why the upvalues aren't kicking in. A similar question was asked here, but I couldn't adjust it for my problem.


It looks like I didn't specify my problem in enough detail. To give a better sense of the direction I'm looking, see this question. My (present) understanding of Derivative suggests it cannot achieve what I want since the arguments to my functions are abstract indices (e.g. multiple arguments are implicit).

Consider a (discrete) joint probability $p_{XY}(i,j)$ where $i$ and $j$ are indexes (with unspecified ranges) that represent the possible values. Now, consider a marginal distribution $p_X(i) = \sum_j p_{XY}(i,j)$. Each $p_X(i)$ depends on all of the $p_{XY}(j,k)$ with $j = i$. I was hoping to declare the derivatives of $p_{XY}(i,j)$ and $p_X(i)$ with respect to $p_{XY}(k,l)$ (treating each $p_{XY}(i,j)$ as independent variables). Then, I wanted to be able to differentiate any generic expression involving those functions. Mathematically, this is the behavior:

$$ \frac{\partial p_{XY}(i,j)}{\partial p_{XY}(k,l)} = \delta_{ij} \delta_{jk} \qquad\qquad \frac{\partial p_X(i)}{\partial p_{XY}(k,l)} = \delta_{ik} $$

Here is a toy expression I'd like to differentiate:

$$\frac{\partial}{\partial p_{XY}(k,l)} \left[ p_{XY}(i,j) p_X(i)^2 \right] = \delta_{ik} \delta_{jl}\, p_X(i)^2 + 2 p_{XY}(i,j)\, p_X(i) \, \delta_{ik} $$

The above is just an application of the product rule, so it's pretty straight-forward to do these calculations by hand, once the derivatives of the primitives are specified. However, I don't want to re-specify all the rules of differentiation. Somehow I'd like to tell Mathematica to use its own system, while incorporating my primitives.

Things I've tried...

pXY /: D[pXY[i_, j_], pXY[k_, l_]] := Simplify[KroneckerDelta[i, k] KroneckerDelta[j, l]]
pX /: D[pX[i_], pXY[j_, k_]] := KroneckerDelta[i, j]
D[pXY[i, j] pX[i]^2, pXY[k, l]]   (* Undesirably returns 0 *)

I think I understand why (via pattern matching) this gives 0. Another attempt:

pXY /: D[pXY[i_, j_], pXY[k_, l_]] := Simplify[KroneckerDelta[i, k] KroneckerDelta[j, l]]
pX[i_] := MySumX[pXY[i, j], {i, j}]
MySum /: D[MySum[s_, {i_, j_}], pXY[k_, l_]] := D[s /. {i -> k, j -> l}, pXY[k, l]]
MySumX /: D[MySumX[s_, {i_, j_}], pXY[k_, l_]] := D[s /. {i -> k}, pXY[k, l]]

D[pX[i], pXY[i, k]]  (* Result is correct *)
D[pXY[i, j] + pX[i], pXY[k, l]] (* Result is not correct *)

Hopefully its clearer now how the original question relates to what I'm truly after. Just to keep it fun, here is another expression I'd like to differentiate:

$$ \frac{\partial}{\partial p_{XY}(k,l)} \sum_{i,j} p_{XY}(i,j)\log \frac{ p_{XY}(i,j)}{p_X(i) p_Y(j)}$$

share|improve this question
You haven't defined any values for D[X[x] + Y[x], x] so Mathematica computes it as normal, giving X'[x] + Y'[x]. Note that the result is in terms of Derivative not D. I think you will be better off defining your custom derivatives as subvalues of Derivative, e.g. X'[_] := A; Y'[_] := B; –  Simon Woods Feb 18 '14 at 9:41
I'm not sure if I can do it via Derivative. I've updated the question to make it more clear. –  Tom Feb 18 '14 at 17:40

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted


In my original answer (which I have left below for entertainment value) I asserted that it would be difficult to make it work with upvalues using D, but Tom has reminded me of the NonConstants option. When the symbols listed as NonConstants are differentiated they remain as expressions with head D:

D[a x, x, NonConstants -> {a}]
(*  a + x D[a, x, NonConstants -> {a}]  *)

This means that it is perfectly possible to use the upvalues approach suggested in the question, all that is required is to extend the pattern with a BlankNullSequence[] to allow for the presence of the option.

pXY /: D[pXY[i_, j_], pXY[k_, l_], ___] := Simplify[KroneckerDelta[i, k] KroneckerDelta[j, l]]
pX /: D[pX[i_], pXY[j_, k_], ___] := KroneckerDelta[i, j]

SetOptions[D, NonConstants -> {pXY, pX}];

D[pXY[i, j] pX[i]^2, pXY[k, l]]
(*  KroneckerDelta[i, k] KroneckerDelta[j, l] pX[i]^2 + 
  2 KroneckerDelta[i, k] pX[i] pXY[i, j]  *)

Original answer

In response to the updated question:

I think it will be very difficult to make it work using rules based on D. This simple example shows the problem:

a /: D[a[x], x] := 1

D[a[x], x]
(* 1 *)

D[2 a[x], x]
(* 2 a'[x] *)

Because there is no special rule defined for D[2 a[x], x] it is evaluated as normal, giving 2 Derivative[1][a][x]. You could of course add lots more upvalues to deal with different expressions, but you will end up effectively rewriting the rules of differentiation.

A better solution is to create your special rules based on Derivative, like this:

pXY[i_, j_]'[pXY[k_, l_]] := Simplify[KroneckerDelta[i, k] KroneckerDelta[j, l]]
pX[i_]'[pXY[j_, k_]] := KroneckerDelta[i, j]

You will note that your example does not appear to work, however:

D[pXY[i, j] pX[i]^2, pXY[k, l]]
(* 0 *)

What's going on here is that D sees that the function does not appear to depend on the differentiation variable, so it returns 0 immediately. It's the same as D[Sin, x] returning 0 while D[Sin[x], x] returns Cos[x]. The solution is to make the expression explicitly a function of the differentiation variable:

D[pXY[i, j][pXY[k, l]] pX[i][pXY[k, l]]^2, pXY[k, l]]
(* KroneckerDelta[i, k] KroneckerDelta[j, l] pX[i][pXY[k, l]]^2 + 
 2 KroneckerDelta[i, k] pX[i][pXY[k, l]] pXY[i, j][pXY[k, l]] *)

This works, but has made the notation messy. A possible solution is to define your own version of D which automatically converts func to func[var] before differentiating, and then converts func[var] back to func afterwards.

myD[expr_, var_] := D[expr /. (p_pX | p_pXY) :> p[var], var] /. (p_pX | p_pXY)[var] :> p

You now have:

myD[pXY[i, j] pX[i]^2, pXY[k, l]] 
(* KroneckerDelta[i, k] KroneckerDelta[j, l] pX[i]^2 + 
 2 KroneckerDelta[i, k] pX[i] pXY[i, j] *)
share|improve this answer
This works quite nicely, and I was able to adapt it to my problem. Could you comment on whether or not using NonConstants in D[] would work as well? –  Tom Feb 19 '14 at 18:01
@Tom, I had completely forgotten about NonConstants. That means you can use upvalues as you suggested. Update coming up. –  Simon Woods Feb 20 '14 at 10:53

Using information from the question you've linked:

Derivative[1][X][_] = A
Derivative[1][Y][_] = B

D[X[x], x]        
D[X[x] + Y[x], x] 
D[X[x] Y[x], x]  
B X[x] + A Y[x]

Nothing else is required since D[X[x], y] is from definition 0.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.