Mathematica Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Mathematica. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I currently simulate data with a lognormal distributed covariate. I used the following code to check the generated random numbers (with Mathematica 9).

slogn2 = Select[RandomVariate[LogNormalDistribution[6, 9], 10000000], # < 10 &]; 
     Histogram[slogn2, 200, "ProbabilityDensity"],
     Plot[PDF[LogNormalDistribution[6, 9], x], {x, 0.0001, 10}, 
          PlotRange -> All, PlotStyle -> Thick], 
     PlotRange -> {{0, 10}, Automatic}


I found an unexpected deviation from the PDF. The histogram data are well above the density (see image). Does this indicate an error in the random number generation or how can this be explained?

share|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

The reason the curves do not match is because you have truncated the simulated data above $X > 10$, so the empirical density histogram is scaled incorrectly. $\Pr[X \le 10] \approx 0.34$, so almost 66% of your simulated observations are truncated.

Try plotting this:

Show[Histogram[Select[RandomVariate[LogNormalDistribution[6, 9], 10^6], # <= 10 &],
               200, "ProbabilityDensity"],
     Plot[PDF[LogNormalDistribution[6, 9], x] / CDF[LogNormalDistribution[6, 9], 10],
          {x, 0.0001, 10}, PlotRange -> All, PlotStyle -> Thick],
     PlotRange -> {{0, 10}, Automatic}]

You can also censor the distribution instead of truncating it:

s = Min[#, 20] & /@ RandomVariate[LogNormalDistribution[6, 9], 10^6];
Show[Histogram[s, 200, "ProbabilityDensity"],
     Plot[PDF[LogNormalDistribution[6, 9], x], {x, 0.0001, 20}, PlotRange -> All,
          PlotStyle -> Thick],
     PlotRange -> {{0, 20}, Automatic}]
share|improve this answer
Thanks for the quick reply. I just noticed this stupid error myself. Should I simply delete the question? I think it will be of no help to anyone. – user11881 Jan 21 '14 at 14:19
Leave it--others might find it instructive. If the moderators don't think so, that's up to them, so I wouldn't worry. – heropup Jan 21 '14 at 14:20
Since version 8 Mathematica has a CensoredDistribution and a TruncatedDistribution, so you can use that instead. There's one catch: in version 9 there is a bug wrt the PDF of CensoredDistribution, which returns unevaluated. This worked in v8. It is confirmed by WRI that this is indeed a bug. The CDF of CensoredDistribution does work in v9. – Sjoerd C. de Vries Jan 21 '14 at 14:34

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.