# Calculations in sequence

I have a this calculation, as you can see it is doing a calculation on each list, from list 1 to list 4 of the datafile. My problem is that using Mapthread to do this calculation does not work because it does not do it stepwise. Is it possible to do these calculations in one go.

example=datafile[[2 ;;, 1]] is a singe list of stock close price from a period of 500 days, looking like this: sample:

{4.40267, 4.85723, 8.80984, 4.62259, 6.74677, 3.41247, 2.3579, \
1.5767, 8.1023, 0.846309}

xt=Range[20]
In[81]:= d1 = CorrelationFunction[datafile[[2 ;;, 1]], #] & /@ xt

Out[81]= {0.999145, 0.998342, 0.997537, 0.996713, 0.995874, 0.995047, \
0.994209, 0.9934, 0.992535, 0.991635, 0.990724, 0.989826, 0.988893, \
0.98796, 0.987006, 0.986039, 0.985056, 0.984071, 0.983062, 0.982049, \
0.981015, 0.980023, 0.979034, 0.978088, 0.977124, 0.976173, 0.975284, \
0.974368, 0.973422, 0.972492}

In[86]:= d2 = CorrelationFunction[datafile[[2 ;;, 2]], #] & /@ xt

Out[86]= {0.998978, 0.997943, 0.996913, 0.995889, 0.994845, 0.993787, \
0.992737, 0.991701, 0.990673, 0.989631, 0.988578, 0.987528, 0.986518, \
0.985486, 0.984453, 0.983412, 0.982381, 0.981336, 0.98028, 0.97924, \
0.978187, 0.977157, 0.976174, 0.975197, 0.974231, 0.97327, 0.97235, \
0.971439, 0.970547, 0.969652}

In[92]:= d3 = CorrelationFunction[datafile[[2 ;;, 3]], #] & /@ xt

Out[92]= {0.999266, 0.998475, 0.997678, 0.996881, 0.996119, 0.995341, \
0.994551, 0.993777, 0.992971, 0.992156, 0.991314, 0.990456, 0.989605, \
0.988753, 0.98795, 0.98713, 0.986287, 0.985381, 0.984481, 0.983552, \
0.982617, 0.981703, 0.980813, 0.97997, 0.979149, 0.978341, 0.977537, \
0.976723, 0.975906, 0.975078}

In[90]:= d4 = CorrelationFunction[datafile[[2 ;;, 4]], #] & /@ xt

Out[90]= {0.998632, 0.997179, 0.995736, 0.994285, 0.99281, 0.991288, \
0.989771, 0.988194, 0.986626, 0.985064, 0.983506, 0.981978, 0.980482, \
0.978987, 0.977529, 0.976089, 0.974685, 0.973293, 0.971882, 0.970521, \
0.969074, 0.967699, 0.966367, 0.965024, 0.963719, 0.962478, 0.961284, \
0.960064, 0.958861, 0.957659}

-
Without the definition for datafile, reproducing your output is cumbersome. – Yves Klett Sep 27 '13 at 7:06
I have added a definition of the datafile. – ALEXANDER Sep 27 '13 at 7:22
Could you match your example data and the output (so that anyone can actually reproduce your steps via cut/paste) and correct the formatting? That would make your question much more useful. – Yves Klett Sep 27 '13 at 7:36

xt=Range[20]