Mathematica Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Mathematica. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
 Integrate[(c*al*be)/Beta[a, b]*x^ - 
    (be + 1)*Exp[t*x]*Exp[-al*a*c*x^-be]*(1 - Exp[-al*c*x^-be])^(b - 1), 
  {x, 0, ∞}, 
  Assumptions -> {a > 0 ,  b > 0, c > 0, al > 0, be > 0, t > 0}]

When I evaluate the above expression in Mathematica, I do not get a solution.
What's the problem?

For t = 0, the above expression is a proper "pdf". With a simple transformation we can prove the value of the integral is 1. But Mathematica not get solution. For manual solution, I get the following:

$$\frac{c^* al^* be}{B(a,b)} \int_0^\infty x^{-be-1} e^{-al^* a^* c^* x^{-be}} (1-e^{-al^* c^* x^{-be}})^{b-1}\,\mathrm{d}x$$ Write $z=e^{-al^* c^* x^{-be}}$, whence $$\mathrm{d}z = e^{-al^* c^* x^{-be}} (al^* be^* c^* x^{-be-1})\,\mathrm{d}x$$ and $$\frac{\mathrm{d}z}{z} = (al^* be^* c^* x^{-be-1})\,\mathrm{d}x$$ By substitution, $$\frac{1}{B(a,b)} \int_0^1 z^{a-1} \left(1-z\right)^{b-1} \,\mathrm{d}z = 1.$$

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Louis, m_goldberg, MarcoB, happy fish, Mr.Wizard Jul 15 at 6:42

  • The question does not concern the technical computing software Mathematica by Wolfram Research. Please see the help center to find out about the topics that can be asked here.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Perhaps you correct Exp[tx] to Exp[t*x]. Otherwise your assumption with t>0 does not make sense. If you correct it in this way, Mathematica can not solve this Integral anymore. Perhaps you check carefully again how your integrand is defined. – partial81 Jun 28 '13 at 13:29
Integrand is defined properly, I also do not find solution with Mathematica, also when I put t=1 and remove assumption t>0, Whats the problem? – SAAN Jun 28 '13 at 13:40
As little simplification you could use one parameter for c*al. I do not see a reason why to use c and al when both are used all the time as product. – partial81 Jun 28 '13 at 13:41
Look e.g. at this: With[{c = 1, a = 1, b = 3, al = 2, be = 1, t = 2}, Integrate[(c*al*be)/Beta[a, b]*x^-(be + 1)*Exp[t*x]*Exp[-al*a*c*x^-be]*(1 - Exp[-al*c*x^-be])^(b - 1), {x, 0, Infinity}]]. You really needn't all those exponential functions inside Integrate. If you get rid of them you can go forward. Try e.g. FullSimplify[ Integrate[z^(a - 1) (1 - z)^(b - 1), {z, 0, 1}] == Beta[a, b], Assumptions -> (a > 1 && b > 1)] – Artes Jun 28 '13 at 16:40
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because the issue it raises is not a Mathematica issue but a mathematics issue. That it is formulated in terms of Mathematica is not sufficient to make it an appropriate question for Mathematica.SE. – m_goldberg Jul 13 at 19:01