# Wavelet Packet Transform in Mathematica 7 and 8

For finding location of spikes in a time series I used to transform the data into wavelet space using

DiscreteWaveletPacketTransform [ data, filter, 0]


and then shrink the basis using the universal threshold in Mathematica version 7 and now every single command, corresponding to wavelets, is changed in version 8.

Is there anybody who can tell me how can I do in version 8 again? I guess I need to use WaveletBestBasis command, but how?

-

## migrated from stats.stackexchange.comMar 9 '12 at 12:45

This question came from our site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization.

From the docs it seems this function was not available in version 7. If you were using the Wavelet Explorer add-on in version 7, this guide should help in finding the equivalent commands. – Szabolcs Mar 9 '12 at 14:24

After consulting a friend of mine P.M. I can tell you this. First of all as @Szabolcs @ruebenko already mentions - in order to get a comparison with Wavelet explorer (v7) to v8, you can go to the following link in the documentation center which shows how the syntax has changed:

http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/Compatibility/tutorial/WaveletExplorer.html

For the problem at hand, if you want location of the spike, perhaps using continuous wavelet transform might give the result easily. Here is an example:

data = N@Table[Sin[4 \[Pi] t] + 2 Exp[-10^5 (1/3 - t)^2], {t, 0, 1, 0.001}];
cwd = ContinuousWaveletTransform[data, PaulWavelet[5], {8, 8}];
ws = WaveletScalogram[cwd, ColorFunction -> "AvocadoColors"];
posData = Abs[{3, 1} /. cwd[{3, 1}]];
positionOfSpike = Position[posData, Max[posData]];
Print["Spike is at  " <> ToString[positionOfSpike[[1, 1]]]]
Row[{ws, ListLinePlot[posData, PlotRange -> All]}]


However, for multiple spikes, he may have to make careful use of a local FindMaximum. Another useful thing is this:

data = N@Table[
Sin[4 \[Pi] t] + 2 Exp[-10^5 (1/3 - t)^2], {t, 0, 1, 0.001}];
dwd = DiscreteWaveletPacketTransform[data, Automatic, 5];
Manipulate[
tmp = WaveletThreshold[
WaveletBestBasis[dwd, {"Threshold", bestBasisThreshold}], {"Hard",
waveletThreshold}];
recon = InverseWaveletTransform[tmp];
GraphicsRow[{ListLinePlot[recon, PlotLabel -> "Reconstruction"],
ListLinePlot[data - recon, PlotLabel -> "Error"]},
ImageSize -> 500], {bestBasisThreshold, 0.001, 0.99,
Appearance -> "Labeled"}, {waveletThreshold, 0.001, 0.99,
Appearance -> "Labeled"}]


The manipulate above shows the interplay between wavelet best basis and wavelet threshold. For more information, we would recommend going to the documentation page:

WaveletBestBasis > Applications > Compressions.

and go through the examples.

-
Thank you Vitaliy but actually the stress in my question was on zero decomposition level, as seen DiscreteWaveletPacketTransform [data, filter, 0] – K-1 Apr 24 '12 at 4:35

Perhaps this helps:

(* data *)
data = Table[Sin[4 \[Pi] t] + RandomReal[0.1], {t, 0., 1, 1/2^9}];
data[[200]] = 1.5;
ListLinePlot[data]

(* fourier based *)
dft = Fourier[data];
fdft = Chop[dft, 0.2];
ftdata = InverseFourier[fdft];
ListLinePlot[ftdata]

(* wavelet based *)
dwt = DiscreteWaveletTransform[data, DaubechiesWavelet[4]];
fdwt = WaveletThreshold[dwt];
wtdata = InverseWaveletTransform[fdwt];
ListLinePlot[wtdata]


Also, have a look at the upgrading tutorial: Compatibility/tutorial/WaveletExplorer

-