Mathematica Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Mathematica. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I need to define the following function

MyWavelet[n_]["PrimalLowpass", prec_ : MachinePrecision] := 
   Table[(-1)^(j - 1) h[[2*n - j]], {j, 0, 2*n - 1}]

which depends on the following code

num = T;
precis = 32;
p[n_, x_] := Sum[ Binomial[n-1+j,j]*x^j, {j,0,n-1}]
pol[n_, z_] := Expand[z^(n-1) * p[n, (1 - (z + 1/z)/2)/2]]
roo[n_] := NSolve[pol[n, x] ==0, x, precis]
absgreater[x1_, x2_] := Abs[x1] < Abs[x2]
sroo[n_] := Sort[roo[n], absgreater]
insidehalf[n_] := Take[sroo[n], n-1]

rootlist = x /. insidehalf[num];
prod = Expand[Product[(w - rootlist[[j]]), {j, 1, num - 1}]];
normalizer = prod 2^(num - 1/2) /. w -> 1;
polyn = Expand[(1 + w)^num * prod/normalizer];
h = Reverse[N[CoefficientList[polyn, w], precis]];

where T is an integer.

My problem is I need to replace num with the value of n when calling the MyWavelet function and then dynamically evaluate, so I can get the h table values assigned to the specific MyWavelet[n].

I tried couple o'times using `With, but with no success.

share|improve this question
The Length of h appears to be 2num. You could feed h to MyWavelet and derive n from it. – Xerxes Mar 3 '13 at 5:29
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Try specifying your function as MyWavelet[n_,opts:OptionsPattern[]] (documentation) and define Options to your function Method->"PrimalLowpass",Precision->$MachinePrecision, like this:

Options[MyWavelet] ={Method->"PrimalLowpass",Precision->$MachinePrecision}

To actually construct all this as a function, you need to put certain steps as a Module, and some outside as auxiliary functions. First you will need to do this:

Clear[rootlist, prod, normalizer, polyn, h]

Then something like the following should work. Notice how I've cascaded the use of prec to some of the auxiliary functions and made them two-parameter functions. Because prec is used as a parameter in the definition of rootlist, it needs to be outside that set of Module definitions. If I had not put the definition of rootlist inside the curly braces defining the names of modularized variables, i.e. I had written Module[{rootlist, prod...},rootlist= x/.insidehalf[n,prec], this wouldn't have been necessary.

p[n_, x_] := Sum[Binomial[n - 1 + j, j]*x^j, {j, 0, n - 1}]    
pol[n_, z_] := Expand[z^(n - 1)*p[n, (1 - (z + 1/z)/2)/2]]   
roo[n_, prec_] := NSolve[pol[n, x] == 0, x, prec]
absgreater[x1_, x2_] := Abs[x1] < Abs[x2] 
sroo[n_, prec_] := Sort[roo[n, prec], absgreater]   
insidehalf[n_, prec_] := Take[sroo[n, prec], n - 1]

MyWavelet[n_Integer?Positive, opts : OptionsPattern[]] := 
 With[{prec = OptionValue[Precision]},
  Module[{rootlist = x /. insidehalf[n, prec], prod, normalizer, 
    polyn, h, w},
   prod = Expand[Product[(w - rootlist[[j]]), {j, 1, n - 1}]];
   normalizer = prod 2^(n - 1/2) /. w -> 1;
   polyn = Expand[(1 + w)^n*prod/normalizer];
   h = Reverse[N[CoefficientList[polyn, w], prec]];
   Table[(-1)^(j - 1) h[[2*n - j]], {j, 0, 2*n - 1}]

Note that you have small imaginary parts that you might not want:

MyWavelet[3, Precision -> 32]

  {-0.03522629188570953660274066471551 + 
  0.*10^-33 I, -0.0854412738820266616928191691818 + 0.*10^-33 I, 
 0.1350110200102545886963899066994 + 0.*10^-32 I, 
 0.4598775021184915700951519421476 + 
  0.*10^-32 I, -0.8068915093110925764944936040887 + 0.*10^-32 I, 
 0.3326705529500826159985115891390 + 0.*10^-33 I}

You can get rid of them using Chop.

By the way, the Method doesn't currently do anything, but I assume this is a cut-down version of the real problem.

share|improve this answer
I made one small change - you were using the OP's symbol precis, where I suspect you wanted your symbol prec scoped by your With statement. – Mark McClure Mar 3 '13 at 13:44
Is there any specific reason that you're using number $MachinePrecision (which might be nice, if you want the precision tracked), rather than the symbol MachinePrecision (which might be nice, if you want speed)? – Mark McClure Mar 3 '13 at 13:46
The problem is the values I obtain and assign to the specific MyWavelet[n] are not a valid wavelet specification, i.e. {{0,val0},{1,val1},{2,val2},{3,val3}} for n = 2. I need to make this work so I can plot the mother and father functions, which I was unable to do using the old "change-everything-by-hand" method. – Sektor Mar 3 '13 at 15:01
Thanks @MarkMcClure - stupid typo from answering too quickly! No specific reason I used $MachinePrecision, might have just used the one I remembered. – Verbeia Mar 3 '13 at 22:42

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.