Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematica Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Mathematica. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a very basic question. I am trying to code the LHS of the differential equation: $$\Big[\frac{1}{\sin\theta}\frac{d}{d\theta}\big(\sin\theta\frac{d}{d\theta}\big)-\frac{m^2}{\sin^2\theta}+n(n+1)\Big]f(\theta)=0$$ into Mathematica. As you can see, in the first term, the differential operator is nested and is to properly act on the function $f(\theta)$.

I tried to use #1, but (lol) I don't know how to use it!

This is what I have:

Sin[θ]^(-1) D[Sin[θ] D[#1, θ], θ] - m^2*#1/Sin[θ]^2 + n (n + 1) #1

What next?!

Also: I don't want to just stick in f[θ] into where I have #1, because eventually I would like to be able to make change of variables!

share|improve this question
Aren't you just missing an & at the end? –  Ajasja Mar 2 '13 at 20:48
One way to go about this is discussed in a notebook available here. See the first example in the section "Some noncommutative algebraic manipulation" –  Daniel Lichtblau Mar 2 '13 at 20:54
@Ajasja Hey! it looks like this is on the right track. I added an & at the end, and all the #1's turned Green. What next? –  QuantumDot Mar 2 '13 at 21:08
You might also be interested in this: Having the derivative be an operator and How to change coordinates of a differential operator? –  Jens Mar 2 '13 at 22:25
@Jens Thank you for these reference! They are very helpful! –  QuantumDot Mar 3 '13 at 3:35

4 Answers 4

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Why not just define a Function ?

Mathematica graphics

ClearAll[m, n, x, foo]
oper = Function[{f, \[Theta]}, (1/
      Sin[\[Theta]] D[Sin[\[Theta]] D[f[\[Theta]], \[Theta]]] - 
     m^2/Sin[\[Theta]]^2 f[\[Theta]] + n (n + 1) f[\[Theta]])];
oper[foo, x]
foo[x_] := Sin[x]*Cos[x]*x^4
oper[foo, x]
share|improve this answer
(+1) That's how I'd do it. –  Jens Mar 2 '13 at 22:24
Except - you don't need the theta in the argument list. In fact, this mixes two alternative approaches: either make the operator always differentiate its argument f with respect to the global variable theta, or do the differentiation with respect to the first slot in f. It's two different things. –  Jens Mar 2 '13 at 22:30
+1, that's the obvious way. but you've mixed up $\theta$ and #1 :) –  acl Mar 2 '13 at 22:37
@Nasser sorry I didn't have time to respond yesterday. I added my own answer to explain what I'd do differently. –  Jens Mar 3 '13 at 18:22

If you are on version 9 you could use the built-in functions (previously available in the VectorAnalysis package). The following might get you close to what you need :

Laplacian[f[theta], {r, theta, phi}, "Spherical"] // Simplify
(* (Cot[theta] Derivative[1][f][theta] + (f^\[Prime]\[Prime])[theta])/r^2 *)
share|improve this answer

Well, I hope you're not pulling my leg here (at 1000 rep one would think you have met pure (anonymous) functions before, or have at least learned where to get help: type & and press F1). But here it goes:

(*Assign the operator in the form of an anonymous function  to oper*)
oper = Sin[\[Theta]]^(-1) D[Sin[\[Theta]] D[#1, \[Theta]], \[Theta]] - 
   m^2*#1/Sin[\[Theta]]^2 + n (n + 1) #1 &;

(*use it*)
oper [f[\[Theta]]]
share|improve this answer
Lol! I am not pulling your leg. My 1000 reputation is coming from asking 1000 idiotic questions. Check my profile. But your response is very helpful! –  QuantumDot Mar 3 '13 at 3:34

The differential operator in this question is itself indexed by two variables m and n. This arises after expressing the Laplace operator in spherical coordinates (see the answer by b.gatessucks, but that answer was incomplete because it dropped the $\phi$ dependence too early) and then assuming that the function on which we operate is proportional to $\exp(im\phi)$.

In the other answers that define a function for this operator, the parameters m and n appear as global variables inside the function. That's inconvenient in practice because these indices correspond to physical parameters (the angular momentum components) that are adjustable. So m and n need to appear in the list of variables on which the operator depends.

The next thing on which the operator depends is the independent variable $\theta$ with respect to which we want to take derivatives. It would be reasonable to make this work along the lines of D, which means in particular that it should handle a case like this:

foo[x_] := Sin[θ] Sin[x]
D[foo[θ], θ]

2 Sin[θ] Cos[θ]

This will not work if you define an operator function like this:

myOp = Function[{f, θ}, D[f[θ], θ]];
myOp[foo[θ], θ]

$\sin ^2(\theta )'(\theta )+(2 \sin (\theta )\cos (\theta ))(\theta )$

The problem is that myOp expects to be passed a function instead of an expression. This is not how D works. The purpose of the second argument of D[f,x] is to identify the variable appearing in f that is to be varied. The above method in myOp is basically what Nasser used in his answer. It performs a differentiation with respect to the first slot in the first argument assuming it is a function, and then return the result with the variable $\theta$ inserted in that slot. That's not wrong, it's just an interpretation of differentiation that differs from what D does.

An approach more consistent with D is this definition:

newOp = Function[{f, θ}, D[f, θ]];
newOp[foo[θ], θ]

2 Cos[θ] Sin[θ]

But in this question, the variable θ plays a role that is better grouped together with the indices m and n, and separated from the function f on which the operator acts. Now that I identified how I want to think about the variables on which the differential operator depends, the definition I would use is as follows:

Clear[operNM, n, m, var]
operNM[n_, m_, var_] = Function[{f}, D[Sin[var] D[f, var], var]/Sin[var] - 
    (m^2 f)/Sin[var]^2 + n (n + 1) f

This defines operNM[n, m, var] as an operator to which you then supply an expression that it operates on:


$\csc (\theta ) \left(4 \sin (\theta ) \cos^2(\theta )-2 \sin ^3(\theta )\right)-m^2+n(n+1) \sin ^2(\theta )$

Having the operator act on expressions instead of expecting its argument to be a function is more practical especially when you deal with functions of several variables. In quantum mechanics, the name of the coordinate in a many-particle wave function is tied to the index of the particle it represents, and function slots are then not a convenient way to keep track of that information. In operNM you can choose the desired differentiation variable independently of where in the expression it appears.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.