Mathematica Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Mathematica. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am new to Mathematica and just experimenting with the different programming constructs. I have been looking at Map and how to evaluate a function for a list of values and there seems to quite a number of different ways of doing this. I have used Trace to look at what goes on in more detail but is there any difference in the approaches shown below other than syntax? In my example, both @ and /@ appear to be equivalent to Map.

f[x_] := x^2;    
f /@ {1, 2, 3} // Trace

{f /@ {1, 2, 3}, {f[1], f[2], f[3]}, {f[1], 1^2, 1}, {f[2], 2^2, 4}, {f[3], 3^2, 9}, {1, 4, 9}}

f @ {1, 2, 3} // Trace

{f[{1, 2, 3}], {1, 2, 3}^2, {1^2, 2^2, 3^2}, {1^2, 1}, {2^2, 4}, {3^2, 9}, {1, 4, 9}}

f[{1, 2, 3}] // Trace

{f[{1, 2, 3}], {1, 2, 3}^2, {1^2, 2^2, 3^2}, {1^2, 1}, {2^2, 4}, {3^2, 9}, {1, 4, 9}}

{1, 2, 3} // f // Trace

{f[{1, 2, 3}], {1, 2, 3}^2, {1^2, 2^2, 3^2}, {1^2, 1}, {2^2, 4}, {3^2, 9}, {1, 4, 9}}

share|improve this question
If you test with f[x_]:=g[x] instead you'll see a difference. The three last examples are just different notations for the same thing. f@x is f[a] is a//f, in FullForm they are all represented as f[a] – jVincent Feb 7 '13 at 10:59
They are not equivalent, but Power has attribute Listable which automatically threads over lists... – Yves Klett Feb 7 '13 at 11:01
ok. Thanks. I can see differences when i used the example f[x_]:=g[x]. If i use SetAttributes/ClearAttributes i can make f Listable. Very interesting that you can set attributes to control function evaluation. – David McHarg Feb 7 '13 at 11:09

It seems to me that your tracing gives the answer to your question. The output of the last three traces show identical evaluation and, indeed, this is true in general -- @ is the prefix form of [] and // is the postfix form.

The first trace, the one using /@ (which is just the infix form of Map) yields the same result as the other three, but arrives at it differently, so there is a real difference between Map and function calls. Map gives the same result in your examples because Power (^) has the Listable attribute, which means it automatically maps across lists. But in general, you can't expect a function passed a list to give the same result as when it is mapped across a list, because Listable is not an attribute of most functions. However, it is an attribute of all built-in functions that also have the NumericFunction attribute.


I implied above that, in general, there is no difference among @, [] and //. That is not quite accurate because these operators do differ in precedence.

The operators [ ] and @ have very high precedence, so it's hard find an example where precedence matters. However, ++ is one the few operators that has precedence lower than [ ] but higher than @. With ++ an example can be contrived.

f[1] = 1; ++f[1]


f[1] = 1; ++f@1

PreIncrement::rvalue: f is not a variable with a value, so its value cannot be changed. >>

f[1] = 1; ++(f@1)


On the other hand, // has a rather low precedence, so it easy to get an unexpected results with the // operator.

x -> y[z]

x -> y[z]

x -> y@z

x -> y[z]

x -> z // y

y[x -> z]

x -> (z // y)

x -> y[z]

share|improve this answer
You could probably also add a note on the difference in precedence between @, [] and //, since a new user is quite likely to not know that and trip up. – R. M. Apr 14 '13 at 14:23
@rm-rf. I think you changed the scope of the question with your recent edit. I'll work on an update to my answer that addresses the additional issue you introduced. I can't do it immediately because I find I need to refresh my understanding of precedence between @, [ ] and // – m_goldberg Apr 15 '13 at 1:39
I didn't change the scope; I only gave it a title that reflected what the OP described in the question and the examples (or what I understood it to be). It so happened that the OP's confusion was because of the Listable property. No rush on the update :) – R. M. Apr 15 '13 at 1:49
Another common and important precedence difference appears with Part: a@b[[c]] vs a[b][[c]] – Mr.Wizard Apr 16 '13 at 8:17

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.