Mathematica Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Mathematica. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The question was inspired by this discussion:

How to expand a function into a power series with negative powers?

I am interested in asymptotic behavior of a function at infinity:

f[r_]:=(0.04962 Exp[-2 r] (-1.000+r))/((0.06119+(Exp[-2 r])^(2/3))^2 r)

or (TeX)

$$ f(r)=\frac{0.04962 e^{-2 r} (r-1.000)}{\left(\left(e^{-2 r}\right)^{2/3}+0.06119\right)^2 r} $$

Tried Series[f[r],{r,0,10}] for expansion in negative powers at infinity (as suggested) and got:

$$ -\frac{0.04406}{r}+0.02146+0.02106 r+0.004405 r^2-0.001355 r^3-0.001205 r^4-0.0003607 r^5-\left(8.402\times 10^{-6}\right) r^6+0.00004149 r^7+0.00001982 r^8+\left(3.921\times 10^{-6}\right) r^9-\left(6.018\times 10^{-7}\right) r^{10}+O\left(r^{11}\right) $$

Seems like the function decays faster than $1/r^n$ and the expansion is meaningless. But what does the term $-\frac{0.04406}{r}$ mean then? The function is strictly positive at infinity and I am kinda confused by that. Does this mean that the asymptotic form of the function is something plus the term $-\frac{0.04406}{r}$ which effectively gives the observed behavior? Can someone clarify it? How can one explain the term $-\frac{0.04406}{r}$?

share|improve this question
1) you forgot the underscore after r in the definition of f. Probably not essential in this case. 2) you have round brackets around r in the Series call. 3) In the answer you linked to, the series is developed at infinity, you use 0. – Sjoerd C. de Vries Jan 27 '13 at 18:52
$-0.04406 = 0.04962(-1.000) / (1 + 0.06119)^2$ exactly as it should: this is the limiting behavior of $r f(r)$ as $r$ approaches $0$. – whuber Jan 27 '13 at 19:08
Series[f[r],{r,0,10}] is equivalent to Series[f[r],{1/r,Infinity,10}], isn't it? we can not use negative powers in Series, though – molkee Jan 27 '13 at 19:20
I am just wondering whether or not this term has anything to do with the behavior of the function at infinity. – molkee Jan 27 '13 at 19:34
It goes to zero ~ 13.25*Exp[-2*r]. – Daniel Lichtblau Jan 27 '13 at 20:50
up vote 1 down vote accepted

It is not quite clear, why do you expand the expression around 0, if you want to study its behavior in infinity? I trust that it is not its limit at infinity that you are interested in, since this limit is clear without any calculations. You need probably one or few largest terms. I would in this case go to a new variable x=Exp[-2r] that tends to zero, when r goes to infinity, and rewrite the expression in its terms

f[r_] := (0.04962 Exp[-2 r] (-1.000 + 
  r))/((0.06119 + (Exp[-2 r])^(2/3))^2 r);

g[x_] := f[r] /. {E^(-2 r) -> x, r -> -Log[x]/2} // Simplify

ss=Series[g[x], {x, 0, 2}] // Normal

which yields

x^(5/3) (-433.157 - 866.314/Log[x]) + x (13.2524 + 26.5049/Log[x]) + 
 x^(7/3) (10618.3 + 21236.7/Log[x])

And go back to the variable r.

  ss /. {x -> Exp[-2*r], a_/Log[x] -> a/(-2 r)} // PowerExpand

This brings the following:

E^(-14 r/3) (10618.3 - 10618.3/r) + E^(-2 r) (13.2524 - 13.2524/r) + 
 E^(-10 r/3) (-433.157 + 433.157/r)

You are right that there are both the terms with exponents and with 1/r, but the most importantis the term containing the exponent with the smallest decrement.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.