I've been playing around with the new units capability in MMA9 and I'm becoming a bit frustrated with what I perceive as an incomplete implementation of this capability and I'm wondering if there are other similar examples.
For example, Histogram[] can take a list of quantities and a TargetUnits specification and it will scale the plot appropriately:
data = Quantity[RandomVariate[NormalDistribution[0, 1], 100], "Meters"];
Histogram[data, AxesLabel -> Automatic, TargetUnits -> "Meters"]

Histogram[data, AxesLabel -> Automatic, TargetUnits -> "Centimeters"]

But the options for Histogram[] do not appear to allow units specifications, which seems dangerous to me and can have some (obvious but) strange results if care is not taken.
As an example, specifying bspec = {-3, 3, 0.2} assuming that the units are in meters results in a figure that looks something like this:
Histogram[data, {-3, 3, 0.2}, AxesLabel -> Automatic, TargetUnits -> "Meters"]

If we then change the TargetUnits to centimeters, here's what happens:
Histogram[data, {-3, 3, 0.2}, AxesLabel -> Automatic, TargetUnits -> "Centimeters"]

Needless to say, one could readily draw a completely different conclusion about the nature of the data even though the only thing that's changed is the output units.
To me this seems like an incomplete implementation and I'm wondering if anyone else has encountered a similar issue elsewhere? If so, I'm tempted to avoid the new units capability until it's more mature.
unitscapability is definitely a work in progress. I've already logged 2 bug reports including one forTargetUnitsbecause I can't even reproduce the documentation examples. For example, tryListLinePlot[RandomReal[{0, 5}, {20}], TargetUnits -> {"Seconds", "Feet"}, AxesLabel -> Automatic]Under Windows at least s is the y-axis label and there's nothing on x. – geraldcecil Dec 27 '12 at 15:23