# What bugs have you found in mathematica 9? [closed]

Since there is no public facing bug tracker for mathematica 9, let's try keeping a list here. One potential bug per answer. Others can confirm (or otherwise) in comments to each answer.

-
Hmm, personally I don't think mma.se is the place for such lists. – Ajasja Dec 13 '12 at 9:04
Well, if it can be fixed easily, why not? E.g. the merge bug reported here forums.wolfram.com/mathgroup/archive/2012/Dec/msg00090.html can easily be fixed like this forums.wolfram.com/mathgroup/archive/2012/Dec/msg00121.html or forums.wolfram.com/mathgroup/archive/2012/Dec/msg00126.html – Rolf Mertig Dec 13 '12 at 11:02
If SE is the right place for good programming practice then it is definitely also a good place for bug reports. – Ernst Stelzer Dec 13 '12 at 11:50
@RolfMertig Yes, but then each bug should be it's own question. And you can get a list by looking at the bugs tag. Also from the FAQ You should only ask practical, answerable questions based on actual problems that you face – Ajasja Dec 13 '12 at 12:20
Clearly, this will be closed. I, for one, think it's unfortunate that we wipe out useful stuff to preserve a pedantic view of what stackexchange should be. – Mark McClure Dec 13 '12 at 15:20
If you do SetOptions[ToString, PageWidth->137] then the predictive interface looks really really weird.
And setting SetOptions[ToString, FormatType -> StandardForm] breaks cell label generation mechanism. And also introduces bugs in the Documentation center... – Alexey Popkov Dec 14 '12 at 2:17